February 2, 2006
News & Opinion: The Baby Business
Harvard Business School Press is doing something a little different from their normal fare with The Baby Business: How Money, Science, and Politics Drive The Commerce of Conception. It is part market analysis, part social critique talking about how there is now a price tag on children. With the right amount of cash, anyone can now have a child. And very soon with a little more cash, you can have the exactly the kind of baby you want. That's were things get tricky.
You can find out more about the book in these places:
- In November, Publisher's Weekly picked it in their Big Expectation for Small Press Books piece.
- Business 2.0 wrote short blurb in their Feb. 2006 issue:
Making stuff for babies is big business and increasingly , so is making the actual babies...The U.S. market for fertility treatments, she estimates, hit $2.9 billion in 2004. Parents are also paying to make babies better: A fertility firm recently offered $100,000 for an egg donor with "college-level athletic ability." Another burgeoning field is preimplantation genetic diagnosis, which allows parents to screens for hereditary diseases. The innovation could eventually create a genetic gap between haves and have-nots. But the most pressing issue, Spar says, is sorting out the thorny legal questions in a society where designer babies may soon be as common as designer baby strollers.
- HBS Working Knowledge has a piece called The Business of Babies.
- Harvard Business Review has an extensive piece by Spar that is based on the book.
Persistent demand from people who have been denied the blessings of parenthood has created an assisted-reproduction market that stretches around the globe and encompasses hundreds of thousands of people. In the United States alone, nearly 41,000 children were born via in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 2001. Roughly 6,000 came from donated eggs, and almost 600 were carried by surrogate mothers. U.S. legislators have been reluctant to regulate this market. As a result, there are no national policies for IVF, which requires creating--and often discarding--embryos, or for many other technologies. State laws vary widely, and many states have no legislation on these subjects whatsoever. Although fertility specialists generally seem delighted to practice in an unregulated gray area, a modicum of regulation and the establishment of agreed-upon norms could lead to substantially lower prices, wider access, and an expansion of the market to the millions who have not yet sought out assisted reproduction. Among those millions are fertile individuals seeking to ensure that they'll be able to produce offspring in the future. For example, the technology already permits young women to freeze their eggs, thus preserving their fertility (in case, for instance, they marry late in life). The fertility trade is in some ways analogous to the markets for personal computers and DVD players, which were initially considered luxury items but migrated to the mass market, earning manufacturers the revenues to finance further innovation. A widening of availability and the introduction of property rights, rules, and institutional policies would make the marketplace more sensitive to the social, medical, and ethical issues that are emerging from the science. For example: Should there be age limits on infertility treatment? Should new procedures be subject to rigorous testing? It is time for U.S. society to begin discussion of these complex questions.
This book's release day is February 14 - Valentine's Day.
About Dylan Schleicher
Dylan Schleicher has been a part of the 800-CEO-READ claque since 2003. Even though he's stayed on at the company, he has not stayed put. After beginning in shipping & receiving, he joined customer service and accounting before moving into his current, highly elliptical orbit of duties overseeing the ChangeThis and In the Books websites, the company's annual review of books and in-house design. He lives with his wife and two children in the Washington Heights neighborhood on Milwaukee's West Side.